A short column crushes and a long one buckles, and the two have entirely different formulas. Which applies is not a judgement call — it is decided by the slenderness ratio against a transition value that follows from the material, and getting it wrong overestimates a long column's capacity by a factor that grows without limit.
This is a solid round strut: 50 mm diameter, 2 m long, pinned at both ends, S355, carrying 40 kN in compression.
Four significant figures.
The effective length factor. Pinned at both ends is the reference case and the one that is safe to assume when the real restraint is uncertain: a fixed end that works loose becomes a pin, and a pin never becomes a fixed end.
The transition is where Euler's curve meets the parabola through the yield point — below it the column is in the inelastic range and Euler overstates what it can carry, above it Euler is the answer.
One expression with the decision inside it, so the worksheet cannot be read as having chosen a formula and forgotten to say which.
Three against buckling rather than the two a yield check takes. Buckling is sudden, it has no ductile reserve past the peak, and the load that causes it depends on straightness and end restraint that nobody measures.
Both regimes on one curve, with the corner at the transition. The flat part on the left is the parabola approaching yield; the falling part on the right is Euler.
A perfectly straight, centrally loaded, prismatic strut. A real one is none of those, and the codes handle it with a column curve that folds initial bow, residual stress and eccentricity into a reduction factor rather than with the Euler load and a factor of safety. This is the calculation that shows what is happening; a code check is what a drawing is signed against.